The Ontario Election: My View of Your Choices
Choice 1: The Liberals

They are the likely party to form the government and if they do get elected they are just as likely to do nothing for four years. Which amounts to "breaking more promises" in Conservative lingo. This would not be a good thing for Ontario, however, it seems better than...
Choice 2: The Progressive (Or Regressive?) Conservatives
If by some chance all Ontario voters who actually plan to go out and vote forget John
Tory's extremely unpopular election promise to fund faith-based schools (we're not inclusive here in Canada, of course), you will get not the nothing the liberals promise to deliver, but rather, service cuts galore. See previous Ontario Harris government or a number of Alberta provincial governments or for that matter, Stephen Harper making cuts to Status of Women Canada, which resulted in the recent closure of the National Association of Women and the Law. You want a roll back on tuition rates? A hip replacement? Well, in Conservative Ontario those things are harder to get - based on precedence.
Tory's extremely unpopular election promise to fund faith-based schools (we're not inclusive here in Canada, of course), you will get not the nothing the liberals promise to deliver, but rather, service cuts galore. See previous Ontario Harris government or a number of Alberta provincial governments or for that matter, Stephen Harper making cuts to Status of Women Canada, which resulted in the recent closure of the National Association of Women and the Law. You want a roll back on tuition rates? A hip replacement? Well, in Conservative Ontario those things are harder to get - based on precedence. Choice 3: The New Democratic Party
Being the socialist and student I am, I cannot help but see many positive things in the NDP plan for Ontario. Raising the minimum wage, rolling back tuition to 2004-2005 rates and
guaranteeing 3.5 hours of hands-on care for seniors in long-term care homes all seem like good initiatives. However, this party has little chance of election because Ontario voters remember Bob Rae's fiscal debacle and of course, here in Canada we like money more than we like taking care of people. (Guess which party I support? Guess why? Could it be that my values place people higher than money? Basic human rights above having more "stuff" because I pay less taxes?)
guaranteeing 3.5 hours of hands-on care for seniors in long-term care homes all seem like good initiatives. However, this party has little chance of election because Ontario voters remember Bob Rae's fiscal debacle and of course, here in Canada we like money more than we like taking care of people. (Guess which party I support? Guess why? Could it be that my values place people higher than money? Basic human rights above having more "stuff" because I pay less taxes?)Choice 4: The Green Party

Most people don't think they have a chance and well, neither do most Green Party candidates. They do have a few solid initiatives, but are still too new a party to have a stand on every issue. They would, in fairness, be a rookie government. That being said, the Nepean-Carleton candidate said the party's goal is governmental accountability, which they hope to achieve by winning enough seats to make the government sit up and take notice.
DISCLAIMER: This is a very simplistic view because of course, I still do not like politics (or for that matter many politicians...see the PC candidates who blew me off because I was a student journalist). I still believe there are better ways to help people, but I now recognize our political system MUST acknowledge and actively work towards solving many of our societal problems if we ever hope to triumph over social trauma such as poverty and violence against women.
5 Comments:
At October 7, 2007 at 1:56 a.m.,
Great White Ninja said…
Vote Green, give em a chance I say
At October 7, 2007 at 11:15 a.m.,
BMuffin said…
Not a chance. They are too fiscally conservative in some ways. The green party is the rookie version of the Liberal and Conservative parties mushed together. I really don't agree with some of their policies, as much as I do agree with some others.
At October 9, 2007 at 1:48 p.m.,
Pookie said…
What are your views on the Mixed Member Proportional representation referendum? Even if we did have it, it wouldn't change much since we already have a system that is controlled by party insiders as opposed to voters. I'm very cynical about the whole party system and the lack of accountability - it just makes me want to not vote at all in provincial and federal elections. Democracy in this country is a myth, since it's only the wealthy who can run for office and lobbying speaks louder to politicians than the voices of their constituents. I usually vote Green though b/c I think they deserve a voice in the debates and political discourse. I'm more fiscally conservative, but socially liberal (care about people but there is only so much the government can do, govt can help make this a better society but it can't solve our deep problems - that topic is a whole blog entry to itself) and there are currents of that in the Green platform.
At October 17, 2007 at 3:11 p.m.,
nickitheheinous said…
NDP for me. Until some other door to door candidate will do ten jumping jacks for my vote.
At November 5, 2007 at 5:06 p.m.,
BMuffin said…
I agree with Nicki on this one. They NDP were willing to go to any lengths to get my vote and they were the only party who seemed to LISTEN to me at all. As my personal representative in the legislature, I believe that is their job and the NDP were the only party that showed me they were fully conscious of that responsiblity.
Post a Comment
<< Home